Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Hume, Miracles, and Probabilities: Meeting Earman’s Challenge
The centrepiece of Earman‟s provocatively titled book Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles (OUP, 2000) is a probabilistic interpretation of Hume‟s famous „maxim‟ concerning the credibility of miracle reports, followed by an aggressive critique of the maxim when thus interpreted. He argues that the first part of this maxim, once its obscurity is removed, is simply trivial, while ...
متن کاملWhat Is Wrong with Reid’s Criticism of Hume on Moral Approbation?
In his Essays on the Active Powers, Thomas reid criticises Hume’s theory of moral judgment and argues that it is untenable. The aim of this paper is to show that reid shares more with his target than is ordinarily acknowledged. The author suggests that the opposition between “cognitivism” and “non-cognitivism” concerning the role of feelings in moral judgment tends to obscure (disputable) assum...
متن کاملCriticism and interpretation: teaching the persuasive aspects of research articles.
Research articles are an excellent tool for promoting active learning about the scientific process. One difficulty in teaching research articles is that they address a professional audience and often seek to be persuasive as well as informative. This essay discusses pedagogical strategies that are intended to help students differentiate the purely informative aspects of research articles, such ...
متن کاملHume, the New Hume, and Causal Connections
HUME STUDIES' Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the HUME STUDIES archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Each copy of any part of a HUME STUDIES transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on th...
متن کاملHume on Testimony Revisited
Among contemporary epistemologists of testimony, David Hume is standardly regarded as a ‘global reductionist’, where global reductionism requires the hearer to have sufficient first-hand knowledge of the facts in order to individually ascertain the reliability of the testimony in question. In the present paper, I argue that, by construing Hume’s reductionism in too individualistic a fashion, th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy Compass
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1747-9991,1747-9991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x